فاس نيوز ميديا جريدة الكترونية جهوية تعنى بشؤون و أخبار جهة فاس مكناس – متجددة على مدار الساعة
Bejaia (Algeria) / Ashdod (Israel): A resounding scandal has shaken the Algerian regime after a cargo ship was tracked sailing from the Algerian port of Bejaia directly to the Israeli port of Ashdod. This has ignited sharp questions about the credibility of the regime’s publicly stated stance on the Palestinian issue and its opposition to normalization. (The source regarding the ship’s route can be verified by clicking here).
This incident has sparked a wave of anger and condemnation, with many parties questioning the nature of the cargo the ship carried from Algeria to Israel. They are demanding that the Algerian regime “come clean with public opinion” and provide clear explanations regarding this “scandal,” which, according to them, reveals the “political hypocrisy and moral duplicity” that characterize the regime’s behavior.
Critics of the regime consider this event a “betrayal” of the rhetoric that the Algerian regime has long espoused in international forums, where it publicly raises slogans of “supporting Palestine” and “fighting normalization,” while the facts reveal the “opposite” through ships sailing from Algerian ports towards Israeli ports.
Commentators and activists have called for those who have long spoken out against normalization to take action and organize protests and sit-ins in the port of Bejaia to denounce this “blatant contradiction” between words and deeds.
Informed sources have asserted that this incident “irrefutably reveals that the regime’s rhetoric is one thing, and its practices are something entirely different,” noting that terms like “treason” and “normalization” are often readily used in official media to “excommunicate peoples and states,” while “complete silence” prevails when it comes to the “interests of the ruling clique.”
Critics are questioning how the regime can justify a ship that was docked in an Algerian port continuing its journey “with complete ease” towards Israel, demanding an explanation for the “absence of boycott slogans” and the “revolutionary rigor” that is publicly promoted.
They believe that this scandal confirms that the Algerian regime is nothing more than “merchants of peoples’ tragedies” who use a “propaganda machine directed at domestic consumption” to distract the people from their “real crises,” from the “suppression of freedoms to economic collapse.”
They sarcastically added that the regime, which loudly proclaims its opposition to normalization, “has never dared to call on its citizens to protest in front of foreign embassies, nor to demand an actual boycott of the intertwined interests with countries it publicly opposes but secretly deals with,” emphasizing that “the mask has fallen.”
