فاس نيوز ميديا جريدة الكترونية جهوية تعنى بشؤون و أخبار جهة فاس مكناس – متجددة على مدار الساعة
In a new episode of his series of lies and contradictions, Gerando returns to present us with a new “series” of illusions and digital incitement, attempting to convince his followers of fantastical scenarios that defy logic and reality. After previously discussing sorcery and silent coups, he now adds a new character and another victim to his fictional narrative: Hamidou El Anikri.
Gerando claims that Hamidou El Anikri’s death was not an ordinary traffic accident but a systematic elimination. However, as usual, he provides no tangible evidence to support his claims, relying instead on vague narratives and “private sources” that exist only in his vivid imagination. All this is delivered with his typical style of insinuations and random accusations, without bothering to present any documents or real proof.
In his latest episode, Gerando contradicts himself once again. He previously suggested that Abdelrahim Hamiddine was the main driver of all the alleged evils and plots, but today he rewrites the narrative to link him to the El Anikri incident, as if changing heroes and villains in his stories is just a minor detail that doesn’t matter to his followers.
Even more bizarre is Gerando’s attempt to exploit the death of Hicham El Manzouri to reshuffle the deck. He talks about international assassinations, the involvement of mafia gangs, and global intelligence agencies, portraying himself as the “brilliant investigator” who holds all the threads and information. But can anyone take this seriously without any proof?
Gerando bets on the weak memory of his viewers, believing that people will forget what he said in previous episodes. However, he forgets that his contradictions are too obvious to ignore. At one point, he talks about a silent coup led by “Hamiddine,” then about “sorcery and witchcraft” practiced on the king, and now about the “elimination” of Hamidou El Anikri—all without providing a single credible piece of evidence.
When Gerando talks about “private sources,” we wonder: Who are these sources? And where is the tangible evidence? In the world of real journalism, news is not built on mere hearsay and vague sources. Real investigative journalism requires documents, verified testimonies, and solid evidence. Gerando, however, seems to possess none of these.
In the end, Gerando tries to cloak himself in the guise of a preacher, concluding his episodes with religious advice and reminders of the afterlife and accountability, as if he thinks this approach can cover up all the lies he has spread. But the truth remains clear: those who seek to sow discord and mislead, and who incite against institutions and individuals without evidence, cannot be believed or respected.
My message to Gerando: If you have evidence to support your claims, go to the courts and present your proof. But if all these scenarios are just a figment of your imagination to gain YouTube views, know that Moroccans are too smart to be fooled by such poor theatrics.
Source: Digital Content Observatory
From: Fez News
