Hicham Girando and the “nightmare” of Abdelhamid Selmaoui’s leaks

Every time public opinion believes that the disinformation saga associated with Hicham Girando has come to an end, new facts emerge showing that what was concealed is even more serious, and that the chapters of this trajectory still hold shocking surprises.
────────────────────────────
À l’instar des scandals de « la badge » et de l’application « Between Us », qui avaient déjà exposed the falsity of Girando’s claims, the YouTuber Mohamed Tohfa has returned to confront followers with what resembles a major “media bomb,” reopening the case of this individual as a phenomenon raising profound questions about the extent of his decline.

Similar to the “badge” scandal and the “Between Us” application, which had previously exposed the falsehood of Girando’s claims, YouTuber Mohamed Tohfa returned to present followers with what can be described as a major “media bomb,” reopening the case of this individual as a phenomenon that raises deep questions about how far he has fallen.
────────────────────────────
Tohfa presented leaked conversations showing Girando in a state of being “cornered by the truth,” with documents suggesting his readiness to deal with sovereign issues through a mindset of bargaining and negotiation rather than principle and responsibility.

Tohfa revealed leaked conversations depicting Girando as “cornered by the truth,” with documents suggesting his willingness to handle sovereign issues through bargaining and deal-making instead of adhering to principles and responsibility.
────────────────────────────
The same leaks exposed how Abdelhamid Selmaoui was once again used to lure Girando, through a discourse that made him believe in the existence of “dangerous secrets” linked to an alleged intelligence project in the Moroccan Sahara.

The same leaks revealed how Abdelhamid Selmaoui was once again used to draw Girando in, through a narrative that convinced him he possessed “dangerous secrets” related to an alleged intelligence project in the Moroccan Sahara.
────────────────────────────
Instead of relying on verification and fact-checking mechanisms—considered the foundation of any responsible journalistic practice—Girando displayed unjustified impulsiveness and enthusiasm, which led him to prepare to publish anything that could harm the country’s image.

Rather than adhering to verification and fact-checking mechanisms—fundamental to any responsible media practice—Girando showed unjustified impulsiveness and enthusiasm, leading him to be ready to publish anything that could damage the country’s image.
────────────────────────────
According to Mohamed Tohfa, Girando fell into the trap and published fabricated content on his page on September 1, 2025, without any reliable basis or critical reading of the circulated information.

According to Mohamed Tohfa, Girando fell into the trap and published fake content on his page on September 1, 2025, without any reliable source or critical assessment of the information being circulated.
────────────────────────────
However, the most dangerous aspect revealed by this case, according to the content of the leaks, is not limited to poor judgment or what could be described as “digital illiteracy,” but goes beyond that to a serious ethical dimension.

However, the most alarming element revealed by this case, according to the leaks, is not limited to misjudgment or what might be described as “digital illiteracy,” but extends to a grave ethical dimension.
────────────────────────────
The same conversations indicate an explicit readiness on Girando’s part to look for a “buyer” for the alleged information, shifting the discourse from a claim of defending the truth to a logic of brokerage and profiteering.

The same conversations point to an explicit willingness on Girando’s part to seek a “buyer” for the alleged information, transforming the narrative from one of defending the truth into a logic of brokerage and profiteering.
────────────────────────────
Manipulating issues as significant as territorial integrity and turning them into material for bidding or investment is not merely a fleeting ethical lapse, but a dangerous course in the trajectory of an individual who, according to these elements, has shown clear allegiance to entities hostile to the nation.

Manipulating issues as critical as territorial integrity and turning them into material for speculation or investment is not just a temporary ethical slip, but a dangerous path in the trajectory of an individual who, according to these elements, has demonstrated clear allegiance to parties hostile to the nation.
────────────────────────────
Source : Fès News Media

About omar qlil