فاس نيوز ميديا جريدة الكترونية جهوية تعنى بشؤون و أخبار جهة فاس مكناس – متجددة على مدار الساعة
In light of the serious claims and misleading information propagated by Gerando on social media platforms, it is essential to provide a rational and objective response that exposes his contradictions and refutes his allegations with evidence.
- Contradictory Narratives: From Sorcery to Reforms!
In one of his previous episodes, Gerando claimed that King Mohammed VI was under the influence of sorcery, preventing him from exercising his powers and rendering him incapable of making decisions. However, in his latest episode, he stated that the King was planning radical reforms on December 2 and was on the verge of overthrowing corrupt figures.
The contradiction here is clear: How can someone supposedly under the influence of magic and incapacitation think about major reforms? Either the first narrative is false or the second is fabricated. In both cases, it clearly shows that Gerando lacks reliable information.
- Inconsistency in Identifying Corruption Culprits
In one episode, Gerando accused Abdelatif Hammouchi of being the mastermind behind corruption, claiming he was a protégé of Abdelrahim Hamiddine. However, in his latest episode, he shifted the blame entirely to Hamiddine, asserting that he is the primary driver of corruption in Morocco.
This inconsistency raises a fundamental question: If Hamiddine is the main culprit behind corruption, why was the focus previously on Hammouchi? It seems Gerando changes his narrative according to circumstances, without any solid evidence.
- Claims of Torture and Secret Locations: Lack of Evidence
Gerando referred to the existence of a secret “Pavillon Cidi” where torture and interrogations take place, claiming the location is heavily guarded and accessible only with special permits. Yet, he provided no tangible evidence, photos, or documents to support these claims.
Discussing secret locations and torture operations without strong evidence is an attempt to distort reality and create public panic. Such allegations require solid proof, not mere speculation.
- The Death of Abdelhak Khiame: Conspiracy Theories Without Evidence
Gerando claimed that Abdelhak Khiame died as a result of poisoning and that the forensic medical report was never made public. The question here is: If the report is confidential, as he claims, how did he obtain this information? Does he have reliable sources, or is he simply weaving conspiracy theories? - Canada’s Role and YouTube’s Platform for Spreading Lies
It is noteworthy that Gerando resides in Canada and uses YouTube to disseminate these claims. While Canada is known for respecting freedoms and human rights, its use as a base for spreading lies and incitement raises questions about the role of digital platforms in monitoring content and preventing them from becoming tools for digital crime.
Conclusion: Gerando, a Model for Selling Digital Illusions
Gerando provides no solid evidence for his claims, relying solely on contradictions and fantastical narratives. Spreading fake news and inciting against individuals and institutions without clear documentation is both a legal and moral crime. Everyone must exercise caution and avoid being swayed by such dubious narratives.
